Comes from the Gospel Coalition and features several well known Christians answering the question What one thing would you change about seminary? My answer would be pretty different from the other answers but I did like what Al Mohler said:
But what one thing would I change? I would want to banish forever the idea that the mission of the theological seminary is to turn out newly minted professional ministers. Far too many Christians—and this includes many who should know better—think of the Christian ministry as a profession. Thus, they assume that a theological seminary is directly analogous to a medical school training physicians or a law school teaching those who will be attorneys. The idea that ministry is a profession is disastrous. The very idea of a profession is alien to the minister’s calling. Central to the concept of a profession is the idea that there is an identifiable body of knowledge and a profile of expertise that, once mastered, renders the candidate a professional. But, as the New Testament makes clear, there are persons who can master such knowledge and acquire the skill set and yet never be called nor qualified for the Christian ministry.
There is a body of knowledge to be mastered and a set of ministerial skills and practices to be developed, of course, but these do not a minister make. The ministry is a calling, and the most important qualifications for the Christian ministry are spiritual. We must aim for something far higher than the preparation of professionals, and our real challenge goes far beyond knowledge and skills.
In a similar and equally important vein, I would remind us all that seminaries, even at their very best and most faithful, can only do so much. The local church is the most important school for ministry and the faithful pastor is the crucial professor. The seminaries that serve best will be those who understand this.
While I question the whole seminary system and the accompanying clerical caste, and I mean the whole thing, if seminary were more like what Al Mohler says it should be it would be a more valuable system. I still disagree heartily with the idea of taking young men who want to minister to others, sending them away to get an expensive and extrabiblical training and then shipping them off somewhere to be a pastor to strangers. If I could change one thing about seminaries it would be to change the focus to training men right where they are, in local gatherings of the church, to minister in that location where they live and work.
2 comments:
Arthur,
I strongly disagree with his statement that not all are called to the ministry. We are all called to the ministry of reconciliation, and we are all called to minister to one another. Apart from that I am not aware of other, more exclusive ministries. I agree with you that "seminary" can be analogous to "pastors", in that the function of seminary and the function of pastors should be spread out over multiple people, and be informal in nature. Likewise I disagree with the concept of bringing in "leaders" from outside the body to minister from within the body.
Interesting post.
Mark
Mark,
I hear what you are saying. You have to keep in mind that Dr. Mohler views things from the perspective of a seminary president. It is interesting that all of the men quoted recognize that there are problems in the system, they just don't seem to get what the real underlying problem is.
Post a Comment