Wednesday, March 31, 2004

More on the partial birth abortion ban lawsuits...the lawyer for the plaintiffs doesn't want the records used and opposes the law because:

"Attorney A. Stephen Hut Jr., speaking for the plaintiffs, argued that the law "in its stunning breadth would ... remove the range of abortion alternatives available to women in the second trimester." He cautioned that the evidence will include "very raw stuff" and that descriptions of surgery were "not for the faint of heart." "

So it is not for the faint of heart because even the descriptions are so graphic? This is the wonderful "right" that we must preserve? (Click here for full article)

This is absolutely heart wrenching, an infant being murdered and the pro-abortion person has no idea what is going on...

"In San Francisco, a chief medical officer for Planned Parenthood testified that she chooses methods of abortion that violate the new law because they are among the safest options.

Asked by a government lawyer whether the fetus exhibits pain during the procedures, Maureen Paul replied, "I have no idea what you mean." "

She has no idea, or she knows and won't say? An infant that would be seconds from crying as she enters the world undoubtedly feels unspeakable pain as she is being murdered.

How do these people sleep at night? Are they just that desensitized? I guess the guards at Nazi death camps got used to it after a while...

No comments: