There has been a great deal of outcry over the plight of Rifqa Bary, the seventeen year old Christian convert who has fled her Muslim family and run off to Florida. She claims her father threatened to kill her for her apostasy. Christians have by and large supported this young sister in Christ and understand her fear of her parents wrath. What Christian isn’t overjoyed to see this young woman freed from the bondage of Islam and set free as only Christ can.
On the other hand…
What would we think if it were a child raised in a devout Christian home who converted to Islam and fled from Indiana to California to stay with a Muslim couple?
Well, that is completely different! What about the danger of her dad killing her? There have been a couple of incidents where Muslim fathers have killed their daughters in so called “honor killings” so her fears are legitimate and she shouldn’t have to go back to her parents. After all she is almost 18 and an adult.
Really?
There are well over 1,000,000 Muslims in America. There are two recorded incidents in America of "honor killings". Honestly, there have probably been more cases of children dying in so-called Christian homes because faith healing advocates refused to get them medical care than Muslims killing their children for conversions outside of Islam.
My point here, as always, is to try to get us to think outside of the lens of American=Christian. This young woman is probably not really in much danger, especially given the attention she has received. It is against the law in Ohio to kill your seventeen year old daughter for any reason (I grew up in Ohio and I am confident that murder is against the law there). She is a minor and needs to be under her parents authority within the boundaries of the law. We would be outraged if the situation were reversed, but religious liberty is religious liberty.
It is disingenuous for us to get up in arms about kids being forced back to public school by a judge in New Hampshire and yet not see the danger of a kid running away from her parents because she changed religions and having the government intervene. It is a dangerous, slippery slope to link arms with the government on matters of faith and religious practice. Many a Christian martyr died at the stake at the hands of the government working to promote a religious view. We should pray for our young sister and pray for her parents that the Sovereign God of the universe would regenerate their stony hearts. We should not cheer the government intervening between a parent and a child because of a religious issue.
3 comments:
Actually... in either case, I don't see this being an issue of "parental rights" and "minors" when the runaway is 17.
If they're past puberty and old enough to legally work and drive a car? They may be dependents, but they're not children anymore.
Anyway, that's how I see it.
Travis,
Well, I am not a lawyer (I have a soul) but while a 17 year old can drive a car, they cannot vote or sign legal contract so they are still a minor legally I believe. There are mechanisms in place to emancipate a minor but bolting to another state is not one of them. Don’t get me wrong, I support this young sister and pray nothing but good things for her. My objection is yet another state intrusion in parenting and a possible double-standard on the part of many Christians who wave the flag of parental rights but only when the parents are fellow Christians.
I know... I was really thinking more in terms of how I would approach the issue in the case of my own offspring.
For example: if she and her parents were living in Missouri instead of Ohio, she would not currently be considered a minor, and this wouldn't be an issue at all. (Missouri's age of majority is 17.)
This case just seems like the legal equivalent of a child with divorced parents wanted to get her driver's license in the one parent's home state, while according to the laws of the other parent's state of residence, she's underage.
I'm just saying it's a collection of laws that seem nonsensical to me. Especially when, in this country, any judge could emancipate such a "minor" on a completely arbitrary basis.
Conferring the legal status of "majority" upon a person is a matter of that person's rights under the law. It's not a matter of parental rights.
Post a Comment