More proof that it has never really been about "choice", it has always been about abortion…
Steven Erterlt has a horrifying piece in NationalReview.com about China's forced abortion policy and the utter silence of the "pro-choice" crowd. This begs the question, if it is about choice and not abortion, sholdn't people being forced to HAVE abortions be as "repressed" as those being prevented FROM having them?
President Bush has cut funding to the the U.N. Population fund "because of its tolerance of and participation in brutal Chinese population-control policies.", and gotten blasted by the abortion mill advocates for standing in the way of choice (plus how dare he bnot fund every whim of the U.N. with U.S. tax player money?). But if the U.N. is subsidizing forced abortion, where is the choice?
No comments:
Post a Comment