Desiring God almost always posts articles that are useful
and edifying. A recent post on the new female mixed martial arts champion, Holly
Holm, who defeated the oft vulgar former champ and media darling Ronda Rousey was decidedly neither. Adam
Viramontes, who apparently knows Ms. Holm, writes a glowing article for
Desiring God, A New Kind Of Champion, extolling her virtues and comparing her
to Jesus Christ at the end of his article. It was obviously a questionable
article given the disclaimer reproduced below:
Editor’s note: Christians disagree about whether men and women should engage in sports whose aim is to wound or hurt the other person. This is true for both men’s and women’s sports. When women are involved, the issues are compounded by the question of how God has designed for women to express their womanhood. We affirm the humility praised in this article, but would want our readers to think deeply, carefully, and biblically about the wider moral issues of the sport of ultimate fighting.
I have to question the wisdom of publishing a piece that has
to make that sort of disclaimer. Desiring God is a resource I heartily
recommend to anyone, wherever they may be in their Christian walk and John
Piper is one of my favorite teachers but an article singing the praises of a sporting event one step removed
from mud wrestling makes me question who is running the show there. Especially
since Desiring God and Piper are some of the very best apologists for Biblical
gender roles. It is jarring and unhelpful. I can't imagine John Piper sitting around with some dudes and cheering on two women battering each other.
I pull no punches (pun intended) when it comes to my
revulsion for mixed martial arts. It is less a sport than it is a glorified bar
fight. A "sport" where the entire point is to hurt someone is a
bloodsport more akin to gladiatorial games than it is to an actual sport.
People get hurt in football, hockey and baseball, and the violence inherent in
hockey and football is a large part of why I don't follow sports anymore, but
the people getting hurt is for the most part secondary to a primary objective;
scoring a goal or keeping someone else from scoring a goal, moving the ball
forward toward the other team's goal line or stopping the other team from
advancing toward your goal line. In MMA hurting someone else is the entire
point, hurting them enough that they are forced to submit or cannot get back
up. It takes the already brutal sport of boxing to the next level by adding
kicks and grappling and like boxing usually features the victor standing
bruised and bloodied after pummeling his or her opponent.
I am not terribly shocked by the popularity of MMA fighting.
After all our entire culture is circling the drain and it only makes sense to
provide ever more violent forms of entertainment to distract the masses. What
is troubling is the number of Christians who are devout fans of this bloodshed.
Stemming from the confused "manliness" of the Mark Driscoll variety
that reflects the culture rather than the Gospel, there is something that is
just wrong that Christians who were singing praises to the Prince of Peace and being
thankful for His shed blood on Sunday morning are the same as those who were screaming for
blood to be shed for their entertainment on Friday night. Should Christians be
so enamored of these forms of stylized combat? I think that question is clear
enough to answer itself. I have written before and plan to continue to do so
regarding the cultural obsession so many Christians have with sports. When you
combine that Kingdom smothering obsession with a gladiatorial bloodsport you
have very little room left for the Gospel.
Now, when you add the fact that this article from Desiring
God is about two women beating each other up to sate the blood thirstiness of
men? That takes it to a whole new, perverse and disgusting level. I contend
that a man hitting a woman is one of the most cowardly acts that any man can do
as most men are bigger and stronger than women. Right behind that has to be men
who take deviant pleasure from women beating each other up. It isn't about
athletics just like Playboy was never really about the articles. There is a
reason no one wants to watch women engaged in Olympic style wrestling, it isn't
nearly exciting enough because the excitement is derived from the violence. I
am of course not drawing a moral equivalence between a man beating a woman or
suggesting that all male fans of female mixed martial arts are closet abusers
of women. I am however saying that the impulse for a man to watch two women
fighting each other for his entertainment, the bloodier the better, is drawn
from the most base elements of unregenerate human nature, the same nature that
caused Cain to rise up and slay his brother.
Another element at play here is the juxtaposition of female athletes
and exploitative sexuality. It is just a given that women athletes have to show
a little skin to get interest from male viewers. The Rousey-Holm fight featured
two women in the equivalent of sports bras and skin tight shorts pummeling each
other. Beach volleyball, an Olympic sport, apparently can't be played unless
the women are wearing next to nothing. Even at the high school level teen girls
must wear tiny shorts or they can't set, serve and spike. Women track stars run
in very little as well. On and on. In an effort to overcome the huge
differential in popularity between women's sports and men's, women including
some of the very youngest, are exploited for their sexuality as well as for
their athleticism. If you put the women playing beach volleyball in the
Olympics in baggy shorts and t-shirts, what do you think happens to viewership?
Even Sports Illustrated, an icon in sports journalism, feels the need to
publish the hugely popular swimsuit edition even though last time I checked
posing in a swimsuit so tiny that you couldn't perform even the most
rudimentary athletic act doesn't qualify as a sport. This is true of all
entertainment. Young female singers often vamp it up trying to make their mark.
If Miley Cyrus wasn't constantly committing ever more depraved acts, would
anyone care about her? How many young female actresses with great careers are
convinced that they have to go topless in a movie to show how "grown
up" and "serious" they are, making many women who are fine
actresses into little more than highly paid strippers?
Christians, especially Christian men, need to be very
cautious about their entertainment choices and choosing to watch women trying
to hurt each other to assuage your own dark desires is not markedly safer than
watching soft core pornography. I am sure that analogy will rub some the wrong
way but so be it. I find women's MMA to be vulgar, degrading to women and
counter-Kingdom. Many disagree and that is fine but we ought to take seriously
the caution raised by the editors and think through the choice of entertainment
that glorifies women doing to each other what a man doing the same would lead to his
arrest. I think that Desiring God should have taken their own advice and not published this essay in the first place.
2 comments:
Arthur,
I am totally disgusted by any of this violence under the guise of "sport". By the same token, I cannot but wonder about the minds of people who would salivate over, and excitedly watch such performances.
And we wonder why our young are acting out the very same stuff! Apart from the spiritual implications,it is setting the agenda for much similar brutalizing behaviour in society. Forget the nonsense about evolution, this is DEVOLUTION!
Amen to that John, our culture is sinking in the cesspool deeper by the minute. We are not far off from a high tech late Roman Empire.
Post a Comment