Showing posts with label Philadelphia Conference on Reformed Theology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philadelphia Conference on Reformed Theology. Show all posts

Friday, July 31, 2009

2010 Philadelphia Conference on Reformed Theology


The topic for the 2010 Philadelphia Conference on Reformed Theology is out and is: These Last Days: A Christian View of History. I am guessing we will not be getting a bunch of eschatology charts trying to pin down the identity of the Antichrist.

Looks like a good conference. I am excited that we are going to have Alistair Begg, Ligon Duncan, D.A. Carson and Cornelius Venema coming to Grand Rapids in 2010. Should be great and it also is not running at the same time as Together for the Gospel this year so I can go to both.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

PCRT Session 3

Session 3

God the Just and Justifier


Steve Lawson

Romans 3: 21-26

How can God be both just and justifier at the same time? If God failed to punish sinners, He would become unjust. A judge who knowingly lets a guilty man go free becomes a participant in the guilt, in the crime. God must punish every single sin.

How can God both punish sin and justify sinners?

Our sins were punished to the fullest extent of the law on the cross of Jesus Christ.

Calvin said of justification: The main hinge on which salvation turns. (Heavy vault doors swing on relatively small hinges.

Luther: Justification by faith is the chief on which the church stands or falls.

What does this doctrine of justification tell us about God Himself.

- Theology produces doxology

Seven attributes of God seen in the doctrine to justification (Dr. Lawson always has a series of points)

- The faithfulness of God: God promised to send a redeemer, a sin-bearer. God bore witness through the law and the prophets throughout the Old Testament. God keeps His promise, providing what He promised so long ago. (Rom 1:2)

- The righteousness of God: Rom 3: 21-22, 3:25-26; Eze 18:3 Breaking the law of God requires the death penalty.

- The holiness of God: Rom 3:23 All have fallen short of the mark, short of the glory of God. Intrinsic glory of God and the ascribed glory of God.

- The immutability of God: Rom 3:24 Being justified as a gift. We are justified in the past, the eternal declaration of God (we were justified before we were even born and committed even one sin)

- The grace of God. Even the faith in God is a gift from God. Dead sinners have no will to have faith in God. (Eph 2:8; Phi 1:29; Heb 12:2)

- The wrath of God Rom 3:25 God provided Christ as propitiation. There is not one drop of wrath in the cup of God’s judgment left for us. Now the smile of God’s pleasure is upon us (this is my beloved Son…)

- The forbearance of God. Rom 3:25. He passed over sins previously committed. His wrath and mercy was held back until the time when Christ came forth. God is patietn and long-suffering with sinners.

As those who has been justified by an act outside of ourselves, how do we justify separation from others who have likewise been justified outside of themselves in denominations, factions and sects?

Saturday, March 28, 2009

PCRT Session 2

Session 2

Justification through Faith Alone


Philip Ryken

Galatians 2: 15-16

(Wasn’t expecting the illustration from TLC’s What Not To Wear!)

How is that a person gets right with God? Not by works of the Law but rather by faith in Jesus Christ.

There is not an inherent problem with the Law, it comes from the just and holy God. The problem with the Law is that we cannot keep it.

If it is impossible for Jews to be justified by the Law, it is especially so for Gentiles.

Faith and works operate on completely different principles
- if you live by faith you trust in God to justify you
- if you live by works you trust at least in part in yourself to justify yourself.

Gal 3: 11 “The just shall live by faith”, the mantra for Luther, the basis for much of his understanding of justification.

Zech 3: 1-5 The High Priest, holiest man in Israel, standing before God in filthy rags.
The High Priest, as representative of the people before God, is supposed to wear very specific clothes, holy in wardrobe. Thus the contrast between the filthy rags and holy garments of the High Priest. The filth of the High Priest represented the sin of the people on the one representing all of the people. What does our sin, my sin, look like next to the perfect holiness of God.

A priest who looked like this should be struck down in the presence of God, and both he and the people are guilty. (This representative, this High Priest is guilty and filthy but our High Priest, our representative is clothed in shining white clothing and perfect righteousness)

(The common theme, all sins will be paid for either by an eternity in hell or on the cross of Christ)

We are told to come and be cleaned up, not clean up and then come.

PCRT Session 1

My notes from last night...


The Great Exchange

Steve Lawson

(Started off, as always at PCRT with the Westminster Brass and the singing of the great Reformation song A Mighty Fortress Is Our God. That is always good but some of the hymns written by Alliance of Confessing Evangelical leaders? Not so much, no one knew the words or music, people were mumbling the songs and the organ was so loud that it was all you could hear. Stick to the 400 or so hymns we know!)

2 Cor 5: 16-21, esp. verse 21

Double imputation at the cross, something taken from us and laid on Christ and something was taken fro Christ and laid on we who believe. It was the worst about us, our sins, and the very best of Him, His perfect spotless righteousness. That is what you call grace.

This is how lost sinners can be right with a holy God (imputation and penal substitution)

What is imputation? It is drawn from the courtroom, with authority from the judge making a pronouncement. Or resource deposited into the account of someone else. The double imputation of justification. His righteousness has been credited to our account.

Five things to see in this verse…

The saving God. “He made Him”. Three key pronouns: He, Him, our. God he Father is the He who made Him, Christ, sin for us. It is not God and man, it is God and God alone. We could not make Him sin, we could not lay our sins on Him. Only God can do this. The only thing we bring to the exchange is the sin laid upon Jesus Christ, our sin-bearing Savior. There are three things that Spurgeon said we must know about this God: a) God is a sovereign God, only One with supreme authority b) God is a just God who must be propitiated for our sins. The God of the Bible is a ruler who, when His subjects rebel, never forgives them until He fully punishes their sin c) He is also gracious, He loves to bestow His blessings.

The sinless Substitute. “Him who knew no sin” That is our sinless substitute, distinguished from “Him”, the King of Heaven, the Lord Jesus Christ. He knew no sin. In no uncertain terms, Christ is set before us as one who is absolutely sinless and perfect. He took on human flesh but without a sin nature. All of the apostles were uniform in their assertion that He is righteous and without sin, even sinners testified to this (Judas, Pilate, the thief on the cross). Only one who knew no sin of His own could bear our sins and take the wrath of the Father.

The sin imputed. “He made Him to be sin” He was personally holy but forensically guilty. God did not just write off our sin like a toxic asset, He did not look the other way. Every sin in the world will be personally punished by God. Either in hell or in forgiveness in Christ. There is a prior imputation of sin, the sin of Adam imputed to all men. (Rom 5:12, Rom 5:18) When Adam sinned, we all sinned. But not only is Adam’s sin imputed to all men, but all of the sins of the elect and heaped them upon the sinless Savior, our substitute, Jesus Christ (Lev 16, Isa 53, 1 Pet 2:4) He died in our place, suffering under the wrath of God FOR US.

The specific extent. For whom did Christ become sin? The entire world, those who die in unbelief, those who were dead and already in hell? “So that in Him we might” On our behalf. See verse 20, then 19, then 18. All speaking of all believers. He did not die in vain. It was a purposeful death.

The spotless righteousness. The second half of the great exchange. Not only did Christ get our sins, “so that in him we might become the righteousness of God” His perfect righteousness was transferred to us. “So that” this great exchange might take place. All of the people of God, the elect of God.

What is this righteousness?

It is posted to our account (Romans 3:26, Romans 8:33) by God in imputation.
It is an alien or foreign righteousness (Luther). It does not originate in us. In is external to us. Romans 1:17

It consist entirely in Christ’s doing, His sinless life and substitution death. He is the head of His people, the elect of God, as Adam was the head of all humanity. He lived for thirty plus years because He had to be born under the law and keep the law that we are constantly breaking. We are credited as if we had lived the perfect sinless life of Christ. Not just taking away sin but His righteousness given us (not putting us in neutral standing, but in righteous standing)

Received exclusively by faith alone in Christ alone. Not faith and anything else. Not baptism, not works, not the Lords Supper, not church membership. Not to the one who works, but to the one who does not work.

It is given immediately, in whole. Not in installments. Immediately and completely when the sinner repents of his sins and lays hold of Jesus Christ. (Luke 18: 10-14)

It is given exclusively in Jesus Christ alone. There is no righteousness of God to be given to any sinner except it be given in the Lord Jesus Christ. There is not one drop of saving grace outside of Jesus Christ.

It is given forever, never to be rescinded. It is irrevocable. Justification is a once and for all time declaration. (Rom 8:33).

This is the dual nature, the double imputation of the cross of Jesus Christ.

We need to know two things: I am a great sinner and Christ is a great Savior.

(Lawson, like all Baptists at these conferences, calls sinners to repent. I always like that they take the opportunity to speak to a large group and not assume the Gospel but also preach the Gospel)

Friday, March 27, 2009

Preconference Session 2

Steve Lawson

The expository preaching of John Calvin

Calvin was perhaps the most gifted expositor of God’s Word that the church has known for over 1000 years.

The pulpit was his principal ministry. The heart of his ministry. Of all the many things he was, he was a pastor first.

10 Hallmarks of his preaching:

Biblical in Content: The minister has nothing to say apart from the Word of God. Everything that is not in the Bible is futile and boasting.

Sequential in Flow: One verse to the next. When he was exiled and then returned to Geneva, he walked in the first Sunday and opened his Bible to the exact verse that he left off on three years earlier.

Direct

Extemporaneous in delivery

Exegetical in depth

Familiar in language: “He put the cookies on the bottom shelf”. His preaching was attainable and understandable with minimal jargon and academic language. (I find his commentaries to be very accessible)

Pastoral in tone

Polemic

Evangelistic

God centered in conclusion

As a sign of how brilliant Calvin was. He preached in French, taught academy in Latin and preached extemporaneously from Hebrew and Greek text, translating on the fly.

Preconference Session 1

Steve Lawson

The extraordinary life of John Calvin

Other than Christ Himself no other figure in history has been as misunderstood and misrepresented as Christ.

Aspects of his life…

Devoted Believer: Out of 71 volumes of writing, he speaks of himself only three brief times.

Brilliant Teacher: His secular studies helped prepare his mind for his later study of the Word. He was self-taught primarily as a theologian. No seminary for him! Started the Institutes at age 25.

Faithful Pastor: If Calvin was anything, he was a pastor. He spent half of his 54 years in ministry, preaching like crazy. Several times on Sunday and every day of the week, every other week. Book after book, chapter after chapter, verse after verse.

Prolific Author

Zealous Reformer

Visionary Educator

Vibrant Church Planter

Indomitable Worker: Frail and weak, sick, much of his life, used to be carried from his bed to the pulpit to preach.

Dr. Lawson urged the men present to focus on the depth of their ministry and let God worry about the depth. That sounds great, but how do you do that if your pay is dependent on the local church?

PCRT 2009 Opening Study

Out of the gate this morning we had Richard Phillips doing a short study on John 6: 60-65. It was pretty standard stuff, focusing on the offense and exclusivity of Christ.

He pointed out that for all the desire and prayer for more spirit-filled lives, worship, marriage and family, if we really desire that, we need more of the Word of Christ. See It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh is no help at all. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. (John 6:63). All pretty standard reformed conference stuff.

I did like one line he had, he said it is true that all roads lead to God. The problem is that all but one of them lead to God’s wrath and only the road of Christ ends in salvation. I thought it was a clever line.

The power of procrastination

So I waited too long and couldn’t register for the PCRT conference online. I figured being a Reformed, RPW type conference I would get dinged $20 for being late and out of order, and probably another $10 for being a Baptist. But lo and behold, I actually got a $30 discount. See, it pays to be late!

Monday, March 23, 2009

Busy weekend coming up


This weekend is the Philadelphia Conference on Reformed Theology in Grand Rapids. My friends Rick and Josh are coming down with some other northern Michigan types (if you aren't coming, I can arrange a ride for you. Joe? Joe?) I may even be able to get James to come along. Should be great stuff, great teaching, great fellowship, fun meals out at BW-3 (which reminds me to bring some instant cream of wheat for those unable to handle B-Dubs) I hope to be able to do some blogging from the conference as we study the doctrine of justification. The pre-conference is focused on John Calvin, as befits the year long celebration of his 500th birthday. Looking forward to it and this year I live close enough to drive back and forth so I can see the wife and family in the evening!

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

Less than three months away!

The 2009 Philadelphia Conference on Reformed Theology in Grand Rapids is right around the corner, March 27-29. The topic this year is Right With God: The Doctrine of Justification. Looks like several of my comrades are planning on trekking down from northern Michigan, so I anticipate some great teaching, great music from Westminster Brass, great fellowship and at least one trip to BW-3 (although I know at least one person who is coming who can't handle the wings there, maybe he can order some cream of wheat or something...)

The schedule is posted here, looks like the speakers for Grand Rapids are Michael Horton, Richard Phillips, Philip Ryken and Steven Lawson.

As a bonus, we might be moving at around that same time, so maybe I can cajole some of my boys into helping us move...

(I hope they don't realize I am a Baptist, otherwise I may be barred from a conference on "Reformed theology")

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

Mark the date!


The dates for the 2009 Philadelphia Conference on Reformed Theology are out, and it is coming to Grand Rapids March 27-29. The topic this year is Right With God: The Doctrine of Justification. Since '09 is an off-year for Together for the Gospel, I will be planning on a couple of vacation days to check out some great Reformed Bible teaching right here in the great state of Michigan.

Sunday, April 22, 2007



Final Session
-----
Philadelphia Conference on Reformed Theology - Grand Rapids, MI





I didn't take a lot of notes, I was a bit groggy from all the driving and the preaching. Good stuff but it was a lot to absorb all at once. Ligon Duncan preached on The Sufficient Word and it was excellent. Now for a day of my own preaching (I would rather listen to Dever, Duncan and Carson!) and then a week of work and back at it next weekend at the Toledo Reformed Theological Conference!

A few other thoughts...

  • Again it was nice to see so many younger people in attendance. Everyone seemed very engaged and I saw lots of note taking.
  • The sessions proved that we can, and should, prepare for worship and indeed engage in worship in a serious, solemn manner. No praise brands, no power point, just people singing the great hymns of the church with a brass quintet and organ accompaniment.


-------
The Sufficient Word

Ligon Duncan

2 Timothy 3: 14-17

Live by the book (verses 14-15)
Live by the book because it comes right out of God’s mouth (verses 16-17)
- Inspired
-Profitable
- Sufficient for salvation

God’s Word is contains the whole counsel of God regarding:
His own Glory
Man’s Salvation
Faith
Life

The most important thing to remember about the sufficiency of Scripture is to recognize what Scripture is. God’s Word is adequate to do what He intends it to do.

It is an act of the highest worship to hear the Word of God proclaimed.

Evangelism and edification
Salvation and sanctification
Faith & life

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Afternoon Seminar
-----
Mark Dever
John Calvin and the Protestant Reformation
-----
Very interesting talk from Dr. Dever on the role of John Calvin in the Protestant Reformation. I picked his talk and my friend Rick went to D.A. Carson's seminar on recent challenges to the authority of Scripture. I figured Dever's talk should be good and besides, Baptists gotta stick together!
------
--------
John Calvin and the Protestant Reformation

Mark Dever

A.D. 1536
John Calvin settle in Geneva. 27 years old Published First edition of his Institutes in November. Became public lecturer in religion along with Farrel (sp?) to teach Protestantism. Sought to excommunicate any who failed to reject Rome and was kicked out of Geneva.
The 21 articles of the Geneva Convention. Number one, the authority of the Word of God. “The Bible comes first”

Prior to this: Rome recognized the Bible as wholly true, as well as the deuterocanonical Apocrypha. The Vulgate, Latin, became the official Bible of the church. Laity was forbidden to read the Scripture. “Holy Scripture should be a secret in some places” Translation into the language of the people was forbidden in response to the Lollards. It was considered abuse to give people the Word in their own language.

Reformation: removal of Apocrypha, reestablish the authority of the Scripture, reject apostolic tradition as divine revelation.

Priests did not give Mass with teaching from the Scriptures. Studies focused on teachings of Anselm et al and priests often Biblically illiterate.

How was the Scripture related to the church?

Four sources of authority: Scripture, tradition, reason, experience.

Luther pitted the Scripture against tradition to cleanse the Scriptural authority. Calvin preached every Sunday morning, Sunday night, plus every weekday (not Saturday) That is the ministers God, to give the people God’s Word.

Five Reformation answers to Five Roman questions:
Which came first, the Bible or the church? Rome holds the church preceded the Bible. Calvin disagreed obviously. Scriptural authority is not granted to it by the church. God’s people have never made God’s Word, God’s Word has made God’s people.
Is the Bible enough? Sola Scripture. Calvin: The scriptures are the sole rule of perfect wisdom. The core understanding of Calvin and all of the Reformers. The Bible is clear in all means necessary for salvation. Sola Scriptura is not a Protestant belief, it is a Biblical belief.
What is the ministers job? Chiefly is a minister of the Word and the teaching of the understanding of the Word, the centrality of preaching. The sermon is the center of worship. Romans think they get God’s grace through their mouth, Protestants know we get God’s grace through our ears. Encourage your pastor, this is his main calling, the preaching of God’s Word.
What did the Bible teach? The Gospel! To offer and set forth Christ to us.
Who should understand the Bible? The perspicuity of Scripture. Calvin started out writing prefaces to Bible translations in the vulgar languages. Everyone can and should understand the Scriptures. Facilitating the reading of Scripture for those who are “humble and uneducated”. The reading of Scripture does not undermine the office of minister.
-----
Dever's strongest admonition: " Find a church where the Bible is regularly taught and join that church." Truer words have rarely been spoken.


Saturday Afternoon Session

-------

Philip Ryken

The Accessible Word

-----

Very good talk this afternoon on the accessiblity and perspicuity of the Word of God by Philip Ryken....

-------------

Afternoon Session
----
Philip Ryken

The Accessible Word

Sola Scriptura, the Bible alone. Our only guide of faith and practice, not the pope, not the church, not the individual.

The spread of the Reformation was accomplished by giving the people the Word in their own language, rather than in Latin which separated the people from the Word of God.

Tyndale: put the Bible into the people’s hands. When the Bible is read it can be understood: the perspicuity of Scripture.

The publication of the Bible is a matter of life and death.

The perspicuity of the Bible is still under attack today by the Roman church (Why else would we need an infallible teaching magisterium of the church)

The attack from the emergent church movement. Inerrancy, authority are meaningless, only the utility is important.

Claiming we have a clear Word from God makes us intolerant, and quite possible dangerous.

Objections to the perspicuity of Scripture
The nature of God Himself, God is a transcendent mystery and cannot be understood..
The role of the church. The church must make the Bible clear. The Roman argument.
The humanity of Scripture. Human language intrinsically fallible.
The variety of interpretations.
Scripture itself. The Bible claims itself to unclear (the Ethiopian eunuch)

Perspicuity of Scripture: It’s central message of salvation in Christ is accessible to anyone. The scripture is able to make you wise. The Bible can and should be read by all people everywhere.

Not all parts of the Bible are equally clear, but those Scriptures required for salvation certainly are clear to anyone. Peter struggled with some stuff written by Paul, but understood fully those needed for saving knowledge.

His sheep recognize His voice, but goats do not. The problem is not with the Bible but with the scoffer.

Two main reason why we can be sure the Bible is sufficient.
The character of God. The Scriptures bear the imprint of God. God is a speaking God, all throughout the Bible. He speaks so that we can know unto salvation.
The Bible itself says it is clear. Jesus and His apostles treated the Word of God as clear and unambiguous. Jesus responded to the temptations of Satan in the wilderness with Scriptures.

Deuteronomy 30:11-14
Deu 30:11 "For this commandment that I command you today is not too hard for you, neither is it far off.
Deu 30:12 It is not in heaven, that you should say, 'Who will ascend to heaven for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it?'
Deu 30:13 Neither is it beyond the sea, that you should say, 'Who will go over the sea for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it?'
Deu 30:14 But the word is very near you. It is in your mouth and in your heart, so that you can do it.

Psa 119:105 Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.

2 Kings 22: 8-13
2Ki 22:8 And Hilkiah the high priest said to Shaphan the secretary, "I have found the Book of the Law in the house of the LORD." And Hilkiah gave the book to Shaphan, and he read it.
2Ki 22:9 And Shaphan the secretary came to the king, and reported to the king, "Your servants have emptied out the money that was found in the house and have delivered it into the hand of the workmen who have the oversight of the house of the LORD."
2Ki 22:10 Then Shaphan the secretary told the king, "Hilkiah the priest has given me a book." And Shaphan read it before the king.
2Ki 22:11 When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law, he tore his clothes.
2Ki 22:12 And the king commanded Hilkiah the priest, and Ahikam the son of Shaphan, and Achbor the son of Micaiah, and Shaphan the secretary, and Asaiah the king's servant, saying,
2Ki 22:13 "Go, inquire of the LORD for me, and for the people, and for all Judah, concerning the words of this book that has been found. For great is the wrath of the LORD that is kindled against us, because our fathers have not obeyed the words of this book, to do according to all that is written concerning us."


More blogging from the Philadelphia Conference on Reformed Theology
Excellent talk this morning from Don Carson. He is kind of frenetic, I wanted to hit him with some ritalin at one point, but he of course knows his stuff. Below are my outline notes I typed while he was speaking....
The Revealed Word
D.A. Carson

God is a talking God, a speaking God.
Isa 40:6-8

1. God’s Words are not the locus of God’s revelation
- Great events; exodus, Resurrection, burning bush
2. God’s Words are crucial to every locus of His revelation
- Burning bush interesting, but when God speaks it comes to life.
3. God’s Words are crucial to the revelation of the Word Incarnate
- Apostles were witnesses of the Word.
- In words, in the Old Testament, in these last days in the Incarnation. From words that are written to The Word. The climax of revelation is in the Incarnation.
4. God’s Words are not exclusively linear, propositional, instructional etc.
- Many literary forms in the Word of God.
- God is a colorful God.
5. God’s Words are crucial to the revelatory function of preaching
- Not merely unpacking the Biblical text
- Not just instruction, should be a meeting place with the Living God.
6. God’s Words must be borne along by the Spirit of God to effective
- Not merely absorption.

Man does not live on bread alone.
Deut 17: 18-20

You’re not what you think you are, but what you think, you are.

Matt 11:16-30
· Portrait of a discouraged Baptist
· Portrait of a defended Baptist
· Portrait of an eclipsed Baptist

Matthew 11: 16-19
The dissatisfied: Don’t like John because he is to ascetic. They don’t like Jesus because He isn’t ascetic enough.

Matthew 11: 20-24
The smug.
Underlying theological principles
1. God owes salvation to NO ONE.
a. That is why He was not required to do miracles on Sodom
2. There are degrees of blessing and cursing.
3. God has contingent knowledge
a. What has been, is and will be, but also what would have happened under different circumstance. What did happen and what did not happen.What would have been.

The great heritage of the English speaking world. God holds us responsible for the heritage we have received.

Matthew 11: 25-30

Three steps of understanding revelation
They are taught by God
Taught by the Son, revelatory grace.Those taught alone find rest