Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Thinking about theocracy

A lot of Christians really struggle with the Old Testament. It doesn’t get the same emphasis in the church that the New Testament does, it is full of strange events and it is pretty confusing to someone who is only familiar with our cultural Christianity. This makes it doubly hard to understand a lot of the New Testament, especially in places like the book of Hebrews which many Christians find very difficult to understand and interpreting the foundations of the Lord’s Supper and the cross in light of the Old Covenant. Because of this, there is an inconsistent application and misunderstanding of a lot of what we read in the Old Testament. For example, how many times have you seen this verse…

if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land. (2 Chronicles 7:14)

…applied to America, often shown festooned with a bald eagle and the American flag? Of course, like so many verses plucked out of context, when you look at it in context it seems silly to apply it to America:

Thus Solomon finished the house of the Lord and the king's house. All that Solomon had planned to do in the house of the Lord and in his own house he successfully accomplished. Then the Lord appeared to Solomon in the night and said to him: “I have heard your prayer and have chosen this place for myself as a house of sacrifice. When I shut up the heavens so that there is no rain, or command the locust to devour the land, or send pestilence among my people, if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land. Now my eyes will be open and my ears attentive to the prayer that is made in this place. For now I have chosen and consecrated this house that my name may be there forever. My eyes and my heart will be there for all time. And as for you, if you will walk before me as David your father walked, doing according to all that I have commanded you and keeping my statutes and my rules, then I will establish your royal throne, as I covenanted with David your father, saying, ‘You shall not lack a man to rule Israel.’

“But if you turn aside and forsake my statutes and my commandments that I have set before you, and go and serve other gods and worship them, then I will pluck you up from my land that I have given you, and this house that I have consecrated for my name, I will cast out of my sight, and I will make it a proverb and a byword among all peoples. And at this house, which was exalted, everyone passing by will be astonished and say, ‘Why has the Lord done thus to this land and to this house?’ Then they will say, ‘Because they abandoned the Lord, the God of their fathers who brought them out of the land of Egypt and laid hold on other gods and worshiped them and served them. Therefore he has brought all this disaster on them.’” (2 Chronicles 7: 11-22)


What is being spoken of here is specifically directed at the nation of Israel and the land given to them by God and the temple built to honor Him in that land. Verse 14 is talking about an actual drought, plague of locusts and disease on the land. It is not talking about American citizens voting for Barack Obama or banning government sanctioned prayer in secular schools.

The Old Testament contains moral precepts and commandments and it also contains a number of laws that are applicable to the nation of Israel. While the moral precepts of what constitutes sin are eternal, the response to them is not.

For example, the Bible consistently and especially in the OT is clear that homosexuality is an abomination, a perversion of the natural created order and purpose of men and women: You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination (Leviticus 18:22). As a response to that, the civil law of the nation of Israel set forth punitive measures in response to this behavior that include capital punishment: If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. (Leviticus 20:13). Sexual immorality like homosexuality and adultery and other perversions of naturally ordered human sexuality are both a violation of God’s law and a reflection of the immorality of the people who are being supplanted by the Jews. As such, God commanded His people to purge this immoral behavior so that this nation would remain pure and set apart. By purge I mean put to death. The dividing line between Jew and everyone else was clear and bright and inviolable, in fact the sins of His people throughout the OT are often associated with the Jews adopting the practices of the people of the land (worshipping false gods, burning their children, immoral behavior).

All well and good but here is the problem. The New Testament is clear that by the cross Jesus has shattered the dividing line based on ethnicity and nationality. No longer are we Jew and Gentile, divided, but one people united in Christ:

For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, and might reconcile us both to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing the hostility. (Ephesians 2 :14-16)

Under the New Covenant, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Gal 3:28). In America (or any other country) we are not “God’s people” by birth and nationality who need to return to God. We are a mixed nation of believers and unbelievers, elect and non-elect. No amount of legislation or school prayer or GOP congressional victories are going to make the unbelieving majority of Americans into God’s people and unbelievers, by their very nature, don’t seek the face of God. That is why they are unbelievers and that is how they stay until acted upon by God.

Thus we have the problem with some of the fringe movements in the “Christian Right” who espouse dominionism or other forms of theocratic rule. God sends us to proclaim the Gospel to all nations, not to conquer or rule over those nations or institute some sort of new model of ancient Israel in a secular state full of unbelievers. I have been doing some reading on this topic today and I am concerned because some of the advocates of this sort of thing run in the same circles I do and I think these advocates are dangerously influential on homeschoolers and others. I don’t homeschool my kids to turn them into some sort of conquering army to take over the culture and the halls of power in America, I homeschool them out of obedience and because I want them raised in the fear and admonition of the Lord. I don’t see that Calvinism taken in its most basic form leads us to seek theocracy, just the opposite in fact.

God is not calling His people to conquer and reign. His Son already conquered sin and already is reigning at the right hand of the Father. Let’s be sure that we don’t use patriotic fervor and misapplication of the civil laws of Israel to advocate what God has not commanded us to do.

6 comments:

Tim A said...

Regarding Thinking about theocracy
I think you have lost it a little bit here and are vexed at others due to your own conjuring of scripture and assumptions of other believers. It seems that if any believer seeks to be an influencer in American politics and values 2Chron 7:14, then he must be a theocrat or some kind of Isreal = America heretic. You are over reacting, making huge generalizations, and claiming theological positions for other people that don't exist.

1. There is a NT passage in agreement with 2 Chron 7:14. It's 1 Tim 2:1-3. The concepts are very close between the two indicating the same truth is part of God's plan today. There is no theological basis to claim the relationship spoken of in 2 Chron. between God and His people is OT only. It's not unique to only the OT.

2. When people seek healing of our land they are not trying to suggest they are better or more valuable to God than any other nationality as if there are distinctions between Jew or Greek in the body of Christ. It is very true that American believers are highly preoccupied with ministry in America and very light hearted about ministry around the world, but that has do to other things, not their political values.

3. Dominionism comes from a view of eschatology, that believers will help bring in the rule of Christ. It is possible for believers to be highly involved in politics and have no intention of bringing in the kingdom.

4. God does call his people to pursue justice and love mercy. Much of this is fulfilled in pushing for certain laws in our country that enhance justice and mercy. Can you handle that?

Arthur Sido said...

Tim,

1) You are arguing that 1 Tim 2:1-3 corresponds to 2 Chronicles 7:14? 1 Tim 2:1-3 reads:

First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way. This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our Savior

How is that in any way corresponding to 2 Chronicles 7:14?

if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land.

I guess they both are speaking in a roundabout way about government but there is a world of difference between the two. Under the Old Covenant where God’s people formed a distinct nation that was physical, God commanded those who ruled His people to rule in a certain way and expected all of the people of that nation to behave a certain way.

Under the New Covenant administration, God’s people are drawn from all people and nations. We are called to submit to those in authority over us and to pray for them, not to supplant them. There is no expectation in the New Testament that unbelievers will act like believers.

2) When 2 Chronicles 7:14 speaks of “healing the land” it is a literal “healing” of the land after drought and pestilence and plague. That is why it drives me nuts when people pull that verse out of context (and out of the middle of a sentence!) and apply it erroneously to a nation. If you want to pray for rain, go ahead but when you have a verse speaking of a specific people in a specific situation and you then try to apply that to a completely unrelated nation in a partisan political way, I have to object.

3) I have no issue with being involved in politics and voting. Nor do I have an issue with letting our Christian principles guide our decisions on who to vote for. I hold very strong political positions and write about them on a regular basis. I do have an issue with misapplying Scriptures like 2 Chronicles 7:14 and thinking that we can turn a people back to God who never were God’s people in the first place. I am all for calling on Christians to repent where we fall short and do so here on a regular basis but that is a far cry from seeing it as our duty to pass certain laws. We are to proclaim the Gospel, not win the culture wars and the church has expended so much time, effort and money for decades fighting a fight that we were never called to.

4) God does call his people to pursue justice and love mercy. Much of this is fulfilled in pushing for certain laws in our country that enhance justice and mercy. Can you handle that?

That is the precise argument that people like Jim Wallis make when they advocate for liberal political positions. It is foolhardy to take a secular institution like the government and try to use it to achieve Kingdom purposes (i.e. school prayer). I would go further and say that we can enact all the laws we like and not be pursuing justice and mercy and conversely we can pursue justice and mercy in the most hostile of political climates. The pursuit of justice and mercy is something we are called to as the church, as His people, not as a nation-state. In the midst of real tyranny and oppression under Caesar, we never see Jesus or the apostles advocating for taking over the government of the Roman Empire or pushing it to enact certain laws. Just as the early church did, you can pursue justice and mercy in spite of whatever secular government you live under, whether you live in North Korea or the United States.

If we want to see Americans turn to God, the method is to proclaim the Gospel to them, not to pass laws to force them to act more morally.

Arthur Sido said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Arthur Sido said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Mark said...

Arthur,

Great post and I agree with you. The only thing I would say different is that I do believe He calls us to rule and conquer, but that is over spiritual or heavenly kingdoms, not earthly ones. Jesus is the rightful God of this world, but as yet has not exercised that authority to it's fullness. He has chosen us, as His body, to be His agents of change on the earth, but He cares nothing about earthly kingdoms. This is why "the weapons of our warfare are not of this world".

frmdeath2life said...

Thank you. I have been looking for explanations of the misuse of this passage and there are precious few. One huge discrepancy, is that it's telling God's people to turn from their wickedness. Isn't the new nature one of the defining characteristics of the Christian? We have already turned from our wickedness to follow Christ so 2 Chron. 7:14 doesn't make sense at all under the New Covenant.