Monday, February 16, 2009

Romans 13 and the Obama administration

Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God's wrath but also for the sake of conscience. For because of this you also pay taxes, for the authorities are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed. Romans 13: 1-7

So I have been pondering what the Obama administration means to Christians, especially in light of Romans 13. There has been a pretty heavy political tinge to my writings over the last month, but after all I have been a conservative a lot longer than I have been a Christian. So I am becoming concerned that maybe I should keep it down on political issues. Is my speaking out against the policies of the Obama administration a violation of Romans 13? Should we ignore the strictly political issues in submission to President Obama as one who rules over us? What is our responsibility? Meekly go along with the administration? Keep silent about issues, not just the issues of human life but purely political decisions like tax policy? I am speaking here of an individual Christian who is a citizen of the United States. I have no tolerance for someone claiming to be a minister of the Gospel preaching against tax policy from the pulpit.

It seems to me that one can speak out against policies while still submitting to authority. Romans 13:7 tells us: “Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed.”. I pay my taxes (or would if I owed them), I obey the laws (except some of the traffic laws), I do not propose or endorse an armed insurrection or even civil disobedience. Barack Obama is the President of the United States, duly elected under the laws of this land and as far as his Constitutional authority extends I submit myself to his authority. I respect him as President, and I respect the office no matter who is in it. I often pray for President Obama, praying that God will convict him of the sin of abortion, homosexual marriage and harvesting humans for stem cell research. I pray most of all that God will break his heart and that Barack Obama is converted, born-again and saved from his sins.

But I don’t see where a Christian has to be silent about the issues. In fact I would say that I have a responsibility as a citizen of this country to speak out on the issues, provided I don’t blur the line between the political and the sectarian. I think that Romans 13 does not muzzle us, but it does curtail behavior. I think abortion is a horrific stain on our nation, infanticide for profit couched in terms of “choice”. But I also don’t think that blowing up clinics or attacking abortionists is permissible. Speaking out against abortion? That is not only permitted by Romans 13, or at least no prohibited, but I think it is incumbent on Christians to speak out in defense of those who are defenseless. So as long as I don’t slander unnecessarily or bear false witness against the puppet regime in the White House, I believe I am in compliance with Romans 13.

What do you think?

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Fun while it lasted

So the near 60 degree weather and the snow meltoff is history as we woke up to half a foot of new snow this morning. Apparently Spring doesn't start in Febraury in mid-Michigan. Who knew?

Context? Who needs context if it makes my point?

So I was reading a random article in the Wall Street Journal on Friday, Church Effort Slows Philippines Mining, which is about the efforts of the Catholic church, led by Bishop Arturo Bastes to halt the construction of a copper and gold mine in the Philippines (slow day at work).

Now what a church is doing worrying about mining projects that are going to bring a bunch of jobs to an impoverished nation is one thing, but then I read this:

Bishop Bastes is following a tradition of Catholic clergy taking on mining, especially in Central America. Priests in Honduras, for instance, have protested open-pit mining techniques and mining-rights laws which they say grant too many benefits to foreign miners.

"It's written in the Bible," Bishop Bastes says, quoting the book of Numbers, chapter 35, verse 34: "Do not defile the land where you live and I dwell."


Now I am not an expert on the Book of Numbers, but that immediately smelled bad. So, silly me, I went to the Bible to see what the context was. Oddly, it doesn’t have anything at all to do with the Philippines, with mines, environmental concerns or anything like that. It is dealing with the land of Canaan and the cities of refuge for those who shed the blood of others:

30 “If anyone kills a person, the murderer shall be put to death on the l evidence of witnesses. But no person shall be put to death on the testimony of one witness. 31 Moreover, you shall accept no ransom for the life of a murderer, who is guilty of death, but he shall be put to death. 32 And you shall accept no ransom for him who has fled to his city of refuge, that he may return to dwell in the land before the death of the high priest. 33 You shall not pollute the land in which you live, for blood pollutes the land, and no atonement can be made for the land for the blood that is shed in it, except by the blood of the one who shed it. 34 You shall not defile the land in which you live, in the midst of which I dwell, for I the Lord dwell in the midst of the people of Israel.” Numbers 35: 30-34 ESV

Hmm, I don’t see anything about mining or the Pacific Islands in there. Let me look again…..nope, still don’t see it.

But hey, it sounds good in a news sound byte to throw Numbers 34:35 out there and say it applies to mining in the Philippines instead of the shedding of blood in Canaan! I guess if you don’t bother reading the Bible you probably shouldn’t try quoting the Bible. Unfortunately, I imagine that an awful lot of people won’t check to see what Numbers 35:34 says for themselves and will just take what “bishop” Bastes as an accurate quotation.

Friday, February 13, 2009

The hidden cost of “stimulus”

There was a disturbing piece in the Wall Street Journal, The Real Stimulus Burden, and it paints a pretty grim picture.

Make no mistake, the overt cost of the stimulus package is enormous. Somewhere around $800,000,000,000 is not a drop in the bucket. But the real cost comes from the Washingtonian reality that once you move what the Wall Street Journal calls the budget baseline, it is nigh impossible to get it back down again. In other words, once you increase the base budgets for emotional programs you cannot decrease them again. For example, using random numbers, if we spent $100 on food stamps in 2008, and then spent $125 on food stamps in 2009 as part of the stimulus, a suggestion in 2010 that we spend $110 is seen as a mean-spirited slashing of food for poor kids even though it is more than we spent in 2008. Once money is allocated for something, even spending alleged to be a temporary measure, it is set in stone.

The deficit or surplus of the U.S. government has fluctuated in a pretty narrow range as a percentage of the gross domestic product for the last 30 or so years from a positive 2% surplus to a negative 6%. With this upcoming enormous increase in spending in the face of an economy in deep distress, the deficit as a percentage of GDP explodes to almost 14%, more than double the proportion we have had since the early 80’s. It is an increase that is said to be the biggest increase in the size of the Federal government since World War II and it will change the face of American culture, politics and the economy irrevocably.

The size of the Federal government only goes one way: it gets bigger. You cannot realistically say that we are going to dramatically increase Federal spending and size now and then reduce it later because it never does. The only way to limit the size and scope of government is to stop it from growing in the first place. With declining birth rates, increased life expectancy and a pending huge increase in the Federal budget we are going to be hard pressed in future generations to pay for this. If 100 people contribute $1000 now but we expect 75 people to contribute $2000 in the future, it holds true that those who are contributing will have to pay an ever increasing portion of their wages to support the system. The problem is that there is a finite percentage of wages that a person can pay because eventually they get to 100%. Then what do we do? Tell the Chinese we aren’t going to repay the debt we owe them? We had better keep spending on national defense if that is the strategy.

Baseball is upon us!


That means that Fantasy Baseball is starting. I am starting a league (well, I am actually starting four...) and I want to invite anyone who reads this blog and enjoys Fantasy Baseball to join in. It is a free Yahoo! league, so you will need a Yahoo! ID to play and it is (obviously) just for fun.

The league is here.

A call for a new Reformation in the church: Why do we worship?



In the last post I asked the “who” question: Just who is it that we are worshipping? Not who do we think we are worshipping or who does modern culture tell us we are worshipping, but who does the Bible reveal to us that we are worshipping? Hopefully that got you thinking about Christ and who He is revealed to be. Now I want to approach the “why” question.

First, the reasons we don’t worship. OK, that is clumsy wording. First, these are not reasons why Christians worship. That sounds better.

We don’t worship to be saved

It is an article of faith that salvation is apart from human effort or action. Salvation is accomplished through the cross and received by faith which is a gift from God. God does not trade our worship and devotion for salvation. In other words, we worship because we are saved, not in order to be saved.

All Christian worship is post-salvation. In other words there is no such thing as Christian worship by an unregenerate person. Only those who are born-again participate in Christian worship. An unregenerate person may “go to church”, they may bow their heads when we pray, they may sing along side us, they may listen intently to the sermon and take notes but until the Spirit works upon their hearts, they are not engaged in true worship of God. Further, any worship outside of Christian worship is a form of idolatry whether atheistic self-worship or Muslim worship or Mormon worship or Hindu, Buddhist, whatever. Any worship that has as its object of praise and adoration anything other than Christ is inherently idolatrous and blasphemous. It is too easy to get caught up in religious pluralism and make erroneous statements like “We all are worshipping the same God in different ways”. The reality is that there is room for two kinds of worship, proper worship of God and idolatry.

We don’t worship Him to gain something for ourselves

Tread carefully here. We gain nothing from worship. Nothing tangible. There is not a return on investment. If we give money, food to our neighbor, visit someone in prison, sing songs of praise, prayer of thanksgiving God doesn’t shower us with blessings. Don’t misinterpret that. God is constantly blessing His people, but there is not an equivalency where X units of worship = Y units of blessing. The great lie of the health, wealth and prosperity preaching is that worship and blessing are part of a marketplace, commodities to be traded and exchanged. God blesses us in spite of our feeble attempts to worship Him. We may feel uplifted by praising God, or doing works of mercy. But ultimately worship is an act of gratitude and adoration directed to the one who saved us, and we worship in spite of any blessings we receive. After all, He saved us from our sins. Isn’t that enough?

We don’t worship Him because it makes Him more than He is.

God is not made more godlike by our worship. He doesn’t seek or demand our worship to pump Himself up. The God of the Bible is not one in a pantheon of gods who seeks more followers to make Himself more powerful. God is God whether everyone worships Him or no one worships Him. Truth is not measured by numbers, and the validity of God is not measured by numbers of followers. Statistics like this religion or that is the fastest growing are interesting but ultimately irrelevant. I don’t care if there are 6 billion Muslims and 1 lone Christian, it doesn’t make Islam real and it doesn’t make Christianity false. Worship is not a numbers game.

So why worship? Why bother? If you are a Christian, you are already saved so why not send God a nice thank-you card and move on with our lives. Why all the fuss over worshipping Him at all?

We worship Him because we are designed to worship something. Before we were saved, we worshipped all manner of idols, most often ourselves. Give me a person and place them in an unfamiliar setting and they will eventually end up worshipping something. They may not call it worship, but that is what it is. Whether their career, or their pleasures, or their family, or sports, or money they will find something to focus and heap their attention on.

When we are saved, our entire view changes. Not our every thought, or desire or deed but our view. In spite of our failings and sins, in spite of the times when we stumble or lose our way, the Christian will always return his gaze to the Son of God. We look to Him because whenever we look away, eventually we realize how futile our worship of anything else is. Christ is the sole object of true Christian worship because He alone is worthy to be worshipped and worship of anything else leaves us unfulfilled.

I call upon the Lord, who is worthy to be praised, and I am saved from my enemies. 2 Sam 22:4

I call upon the Lord, who is worthy to be praised, and I am saved from my enemies. Psa 18:3

For Jesus has been counted worthy of more glory than Moses—as much more glory as the builder of a house has more honor than the house itself. Heb 3:3


Christ is worthy in a way that far transcends any human being, thus I believe the comparison to Moses as a comparison that the Hebrew audience would understand. Moses was the ultimate prophet for Jews, and in comparing Moses to Christ we see that even the greatest of men is but a pale shadow of the glory of Christ.

In Revelation we get a deeper view of His worthiness to be worshipped in His triumphal return.

“Worthy are you, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they existed and were created.” Rev 4:11

Then I looked, and I heard around the throne and the living creatures and the elders the voice of many angels, numbering myriads of myriads and thousands of thousands, saying with a loud voice, “Worthy is the Lamb who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might and honor and glory and blessing!” Rev 5: 11-12

And they sang a new song, saying, “Worthy are you to take the scroll and to open its seals, for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation, and you have made them a kingdom and priests to our God, and they shall reign on the earth.” Rev 5: 9-10

He is worthy to open the scrolls, He is worthy because He created all things and He is worthy because by His death He redeemed all things to Himself. We worship Him because He, and He alone, is worthy of worship.

The why is easy. We shouldn’t even ask why we should worship Christ, we should ask why would you worship anyone or anything else?

Thursday, February 12, 2009

The inmates running the Congressional asylum


So yesterday we had the spectacle of the House Financial Services committee, chaired by that nauseating little man Barney Frank, grandstanding and grilling the heads of the big banks about why they aren’t doing what Congress supposedly thought they were going to do with hundreds of billions in financing that was extended to them with virtually no strings attached. Here are a few of the really piercing, salient questions and comments that came out of this circus…

"You come to us today on your bicycles, after buying Girl Scout cookies and helping out Mother Teresa, telling us: 'We're sorry. We won't do it again,' "said Rep. Michael Capuano (D., Mass.). "America doesn't trust you anymore."

"This country is in a recession headed for a Depression," said Rep. Walter Jones (R., N.C.). "Why can't you do something for them?" he asked, referring to consumers.


Great moments in American political discourse, one and all! Some needs to tell Rep. Capuano that Mother Theresa died a number of years ago.

It was very effective as well. Wow, you can feel the credit markets loosening up already! Boy, with any luck the banks and other lending institutions will go right back to making bad loans so that the taxpayers can eat those as well! How can you have people on a Congressional financial services committee that are so embarrassingly clueless about financial services? Barney Frank chairs this committee and setting aside his distasteful personal life (like paying a male prostitute/pimp for sex while serving in Congress), he has been in Congress since 1981. 28 years. Prior to that he worked in a bunch of other positions in government and academia. As far as I can tell he has never had a real job in the private sector. He opposed Bush administration changes to oversight for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2003 (but the collapse is Bush’s fault of course) and pocketed over $42,000 in political contributions from those entities between 1989 and 2008. He has never been so much as a bank teller and he presumes to sit in judgment and pontificate and posture about something he knows very little about apparently. Little wonder we are in such dire straits.

So thanks to our elected officials for wasting a day of the salary that taxpayers pay them and their staffers, and a day wasted from some of the most key figures in the banking system. Whether you think these banking chiefs are bad guys or not, given the market conditions we are in wouldn’t the public be better served by having Jamie Dimon working in his office instead of responding to a bunch of clowns?

Shoehorn Theology


So what really set me off last night was not the dispensational hermeneutic on display in the video, or the explanations of the different technical and non-technical uses of the word “church” in the Bible and contemporary Biblical times (that was pretty useful). There are lots of things that the instructor brought up that I would have liked to discuss with the other people in the class, especially some of the things he said that he got called on by students and he didn’t really have a response for, but we didn’t really have time. What was really irritating was the assertion that almost all of the reasons people give for not joining a church are unbiblical.

Really?

There can’t be any other reasons?

I would flip that around and ask what “Biblical” reasons one can cite for desiring to join a church as a “member”. It is not because of command or example in the Bible because there aren’t any. Citing the number of people who were converted at Pentecost or a list of widows is not an endorsement of formal church membership. The sincere desire to be under church discipline? Rarely happens and can happen just as easily in any assembly as it does in formal church membership structure.

The process we use today is so far removed from the Biblical norm that it is virtually unrecognizable. Where do we see “coming forward”? Where do we see six-week “new member classes”? Where do we see the congregation voting on accepting a new member or a examination before a consistory? There is only one vote that counts for belonging to the church and that vote belongs to Christ.

What was funny was the way the instructor was twisting in the wind when the students started hitting him with questions. I was not impressed with the instructor, I hope he is not typical of the faculty at TMS (but given that I have in around 35-40 credit hours with Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary toward an M. Div., I am afraid that it might be) but I was pretty impressed with the questions from the students. But the way that the guy getting paid to teach kept shoehorning church traditions into the text and then backpedaling and waffling when he got called on it is troubling. While I do spend a fair amount of time studying and pondering these things and I do have some seminary education, I hardly would qualify myself as a scholar but these glaring discrepancies and leaps of logic were so obvious that if I was catching them that easily, why was he so unprepared for them?

Very troubling.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

All fired up!

Just got back from our first Wednesday at the new church we are attending, and first let me say what a very nice group of people they are. While the kids were in nursery/AWANA/Youth we went to an adult Bible study as a couple and the topics it covered were in my wheelhouse. It is a video lecture series from The Masters Seminary and the two topics is touched on were dispensationalism applied to the church and the idea of the necessity of an organized church with a formall church membership. We were whispering back and forth the whole time, madly scribbling notes (probably being a distraction). We spent the entire twenty minute drive just going on and on about what the professor in the video said. I have a ton of thoughts to write about it, but it is too late tonight.

There were several other women in the class, and the one across the table from us kept sneaking looks at Eva, trying to figure out her headcovering. I probably shouldn't take perverse pleasure in seeing other people get uncomfortable about it, but it still sort of made me chuckle inside. Hopefully it will encourage her to read up about 1 Cor 11.

A call for a new Reformation in the church: Who do we worship?


I have found myself drifting more and more into thoughts of “how” and “where” we should worship and in doing so, while recognizing that those are valid and valuable questions, I have neglected my personal study and reflection on some of the more important and foundational questions pertaining to Christian worship.

Before we even examine the “how” of worship, you need to answer the “who” and the “why” of worship. The answer may seem easy on the surface: “I am just worshippin’ Jesus!” but the reality when you dig deeper is that who God is by no means is a settled question in the church. The “why” is one that even fewer people have given much thought to. I know I have often approached worship without the proper gravity and reflection on who I am worshipping and why I am worshipping Him. A lot of this has been spurred on by some conversations I have had online regarding the so-called “regulative principle of worship” but before I delve into that, I want to spend some time in reflecting on who the Body of Christ is worshipping in our personal, family and corporate expressions. After that I want to get into the “why” we worship “who” we worship. Only after that do I want to get into specifics on the "how" and "where" as I try to get that cart back behind the horse where it belongs.

The answer to the question of “who” we worship is more than merely “God” or even a list of the attributes of God. The attributes of God are valuable to understand and given short shrift in our study of the Word, but a list of attributes is inadequate to answer the question of who He is. We can only and must only turn to the Word, for that is where He has revealed Himself to us. The image of God has been terribly tarnished by many who name the name of Christ. I don’t think most of it is a willful act, although in some cases it is, but it is something that needs be redeemed.

First and foremost, God is holy. I know some people focus on God is love, but I assert that we cannot even begin to fathom God’s love until we squarely face God’s holiness contrasted with our sinfulness. God is not merely a much better person than we are, He is holy on an order of magnitude that separates us from Him infinitely outside of His intervention. When I think of the holiness of God, I instinctively turn to Isaiah 6.

In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him stood the seraphim. Each had six wings: with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew. And one called to another and said:
“Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts;
the whole earth is full of his glory!”
And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. And I said: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts!” (Isa 6:1-5)

That image is one that captures the awesome and awful majesty of God. The seraphim who dwell in His presence sing eternally of His holiness and dare not even look upon Him, covering their eyes and feet. The great prophet Isaiah, in seeing the King is “undone” by what he sees for he recognizes that he and all of humanity stand condemned before the throne.

How carelessly we tread in the presence of our Lord! How cavalier we are in the handling of His Word!

Because of God’s holiness, He hates sin. Not just doesn’t much care for it, or is displeased by it or is disappointed by our behavior. Sin doesn’t hurt God’s feelings. God hates sin. We ignore or gloss over that truth at our own peril because God is not an impotent being who dislikes sin but can do nothing about it.

For I will pass through the land of Egypt that night, and I will strike all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and on all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments: I am the Lord. (Exodus 12:12)

We read that and gulp. To make ourselves feel better, we often throw out “God hates the sin but loves the sinner” to try to make God seem more fair. Two problems though, first that doesn’t appear in the Bible and second just the opposite does:

The boastful shall not stand before your eyes; you hate all evildoers. (Psalm 5:5)

The Lord tests the righteous, but his soul hates the wicked and the one who loves violence. (Psalm 11:5)


(These verses raise a question outside of the scope of this conversation: If God loves sinners but still sends them to hell, what does that say about God? He is impotent to stop them from going? Anyway, that is not the topic at hand.)

But what about Jesus, He is all love isn’t He, not like that mean God of the Old Testament? Hardly. The Son of Man is not a hippie flashing peace signs and holding love-ins with sinners.

“Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. (Matt 25:41)

Then I turned to see the voice that was speaking to me, and on turning I saw seven golden lampstands, and in the midst of the lampstands one like a son of man, clothed with a long robe and with a golden sash around his chest. The hairs of his head were white, like white wool, like snow. His eyes were like a flame of fire, his feet were like burnished bronze, refined in a furnace, and his voice was like the roar of many waters. In his right hand he held seven stars, from his mouth came a sharp two-edged sword, and his face was like the sun shining in full strength. (Rev 1: 12-16)


Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. From his presence earth and sky fled away, and no place was found for them. And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Then another book was opened, which is the book of life. And the dead were judged by what was written in the books, according to what they had done. And the sea gave up the dead who were in it, Death and Hades gave up the dead who were in them, and they were judged, each one of them, according to what they had done. Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. And if anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire. (Rev 20: 11-15)

This is one of my favorites and it should send a chill down your spine to think on the Lord of Hosts coming in glory…

Then I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse! The one sitting on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war. His eyes are like a flame of fire, and on his head are many diadems, and he has a name written that no one knows but himself. He is clothed in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word of God. And the armies of heaven, arrayed in fine linen, white and pure, were following him on white horses. From his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron. He will tread the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has a name written, King of kings and Lord of lords. (Rev 19: 11-16)

Six times in Matthew alone Jesus speaks of outer darkness or the fiery furnace where there will be “weeping and gnashing of teeth”. So Jesus is no 98 pound weakling getting sand kicked in his face at the beach. He willfully humbled Himself in the Incarnation, but make no mistake about who He is. He is not going to be on the outside looking in, plaintively crying for us to let Him in so He can love us. He is riding that door down mounted on a warhorse!

One of the assurances of the Christian in this life is that God is just and will set all things right when His Son returns to sit in judgment. When faced with iniquity and wickedness in the world, when bad things happen to “good” people and evil people prosper, our comfort is that it is not our place to punish the evildoer, it is His. He comes not as a humble servant on a donkey, but as a conquering Lord riding on a white horse arrayed with the armies of heaven for war.

But Jesus Christ is also not just the new sheriff in town coming to clear out the villains and save the day. It is a hard truth, but even those of us (which is most of us) who think that we are the good guys will find in the Word that we are actually wearing black hats, not white hats in this Western (not to be confused with black and white cowboys). Praise God that He is indeed also a God of not just wrath and judgment but also of love and mercy. Were God nothing but a God who is holy, just and wrathful He would still be deserving of our worship but our worship would be all of fear, and not at all of love. But that is not the God we worship because of one word: grace. His grace, His love, His mercy to those who were His enemies is a splendor to behold.

He dwelt among us, the Father sending His only begotten Son to take on flesh…

And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:14)

He humbled Himself, poured Himself out to be like us…

Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Phil 2: 5-11)

He knows our suffering…

Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, and deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery. For surely it is not angels that he helps, but he helps the offspring of Abraham. Therefore he had to be made like his brothers in every respect, so that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in the service of God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people. For because he himself has suffered when tempted, he is able to help those who are being tempted. (Heb 2: 14-18)

He died for us, laying down His life willingly...

For this reason the Father loves me, because I lay down my life that I may take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to take it up again. This charge I have received from my Father.” (John 10: 17-18)

He did so not because of anything good in us, indeed He died for us while we were yet sinners…

For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly. For one will scarcely die for a righteous person—though perhaps for a good person one would dare even to die—but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God. For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life. More than that, we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation. (Romans 5: 6-11)

Christ didn’t die for good men, He didn’t die to make good men better, but He who was infinitely righteous died for those who by nature are children of wrath and self-made enemies of God (Eph 2:3 )

In the greatest and most unexplainable act of mercy sublime, Jesus Christ, very God of God, became sin for us and bore in His flesh the wrath that we deserved so that we might be found righteous before God based on His merit.

For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. (2 Cor 5:21)

On the cross He fulfilled the demands of the Law, he bore the penalty in His flesh and with the wounds in His hands and feet He settled the debt forever. He was pierced for our transgressions and by His stripes we are healed….

Surely he has borne our griefs
and carried our sorrows;
yet we esteemed him stricken,
smitten by God, and afflicted.
But he was wounded for our transgressions;
he was crushed for our iniquities;
upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,
and with his stripes we are healed.
All we like sheep have gone astray;
we have turned—every one—to his own way;
and the Lord has laid on him
the iniquity of us all. (Isa 53: 4-6)


And it all happened on a cruel cross, a symbol of shame that has been turned into an emblem of hope for countless Christians purchased by the blood of Christ, the debt paid, the trespasses forgiven…

And you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross. (Col 2: 13-14)

THAT is who I worship. The Sovereign most High and Holy, most Merciful and Loving. He and He alone is worthy to be worshipped. That is who I pray to, plead with, love, adore and fear.

That is but a tiny sliver of who God is revealed to be in His Word but even that brief intro should suffice to show that the One we worship is due and deserving of all worship, honor and glory.

Next, the question “why” do we worship?

$800 Billion just isn’t enough!

From the Wall Street Journal

Obama Seeks to Restore Some Stimulus Spending

WASHINGTON -- The White House is seeking to restore funding cut by the Senate for schools, health insurance and computerizing health records as the economic-stimulus plan headed into a final round of negotiations in Congress, with top lawmakers struggling to bring the price of the two-year package down to $800 billion.


Why, we can’t spend a mere $800 billion! The President is being somewhat petulant that he may not get a bill that someone else wrote for him that doesn’t contain every penny he thinks it should. That is somewhat understandable given how little time he spent in the Senate and in the Illinois legislature and how undistinguished that time was, so you can excuse him if he is a little fuzzy on the details of how a bill becomes a law. Perhaps he can watch the Schoolhouse Rock video?

Shockingly, to get a little extra pork President Obama is nobly willing to cut back on tax cuts.

To make room for added spending, the White House, joined by House Democratic leaders, is pressing to scale back certain Senate-passed tax breaks, including measures intended to boost auto and home sales.

Ah, I see. So a “stimulus” bill that is designed to jump start the economy shouldn’t contain tax breaks to improve auto and home sales that might actually spur the economy if it means we have to give up spending on “computerizing health records”. Nothing will jumpstart the economy like “computerizing health records”! Hopefully, this brash insistence by the President will lead to the death of this fiasco. The three RINOs who voted for it (Republicans In Name Only) have threatened to grow a spine and pretend to be Republicans if the bill is tinkered with…

The three Republicans who voted for the plan -- Sen. Collins, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine -- are monitoring negotiations. Sen. Snowe said the final package must preserve small-business tax breaks and a measure ensuring that unemployment benefits are tax-free for some workers, among other things. Sen. Collins insists that the cost be kept to $800 billion. Sen. Specter warned that the Senate bill should "come back virtually intact" in the final compromise.

Without the support of those three stalwarts, the bill might die. We can only hope. I wish that the media would press President Obama on the fact that this is not a bill designed in any way, shape or form to stimulate the depressed economy and is instead just a massive long-term spending bill that will have minimal impact (which likely would be negative) full of liberal social engineering. At least then we could have an honest debate on this massive increase in debt and the scope and scale of the Federal government. Instead we have our President doing his best Chicken Little impression to push an ever more skeptical American public into supporting a massive transference of wealth from future generations.

Just say no!

There is a group, Americans for Prosperity, circulating an online petition to try to stop the spendulus, er stimulus, package being crammed down our throats. You can sign the petition here. Not sure how much good it will do, but over 300,000 people have signed on and at least I can register my displeasure. Given my two knucklehead senators in Michigan, Levin and Stabenow who have never met a dumb piece of expensive legislation that they didn't love I don't expect much, but maybe people who live in states with less leftist senators can make a difference. It is not too late, I think this thing can still die in committee.

NO STIMULUS!

John McCain called this fiasco "generation theft" Too bad he didn't show that sort of rhetoric and fire during the campaign, if he had and if he had showed a little leadership we might not have The Anointed One threatening to bankrupt this nation one trillion of your dollars at a time. I appreciate these words from new GOP chairman Michael Steele:

"The fastest way to help those families is by letting them keep more of the money they earn. Individual empowerment: that's how you stimulate the economy."

How is that for a novel idea! Let us keep our own money and we will do the stimulating!